Skip to main content

Independent project. Not affiliated with MECCA Brands. Submissions and public comments are not findings.

Independent reconstruction / S6 / Reviewed

Performance & Growth Rating Scale

A Support Centre rating framework combining values-aligned behaviours, described as the 'how', with delivery against objectives and big rocks, described as the 'what'.

Scope: Support Centre only

This page was written by Inside MECCA. It is not an official MECCA document, a copy, an extract or a downloadable substitute for the source.

performanceratingliving valuesWorkdaySupport Centre

Independent editorial reconstruction

The two-page scale shows how behaviour and results are combined into an overall performance rating.

The wording below is a research paraphrase created by Inside MECCA. It should not be read as MECCA's wording or as proof of an official, current or universally applied process.

Purpose

To guide Support Centre performance ratings and show the relationship between behavioural and outcome measures.

Who it applies to

  • MECCA Support Centre team members
  • Managers assessing performance
  • Workday performance processes

Manager responsibilities

  • Assess values-aligned behaviour
  • Assess outcomes against objectives and big rocks
  • Provide real-time feedback and coaching
  • Enter inputs into Workday

Employee expectations

  • Demonstrate behaviours aligned with the Living Values
  • Deliver outcomes against objectives and quarterly big rocks
  • Respond to feedback

Systems referenced

  • Living Values
  • Annual objectives
  • Quarterly big rocks
  • Workday

Review frequency

The scale refers to performance across each quarter of the year and an overall annual rating.

Stated expectations

  • Behaviour and results both inform ratings
  • Feedback should address concerns in real time
  • Ratings use a published combination matrix
  • Workday records the inputs

Research paraphrase

Research theme

How

Behaviour is assessed against the 'what it is' guidance across the Living Values.

Research theme

What

Outcomes are assessed against objectives and quarterly big rocks.

Research theme

Overall rating

Workday combines the how and what inputs to produce a rating.

Questions to compare with employee experience

  • Were employees told how both measures would be assessed?
  • Was feedback provided in real time?
  • Were objectives and big rocks documented?
  • Could employees understand or challenge the inputs used?

Document timeline

01Set expectations

Values, objectives and big rocks

02Assess how

Behaviour against Living Values

03Assess what

Outcomes against goals

04Record

Inputs entered in Workday

05Rate

Overall rating produced

Related documents

What could strengthen this record

More evidence can be linked as it becomes available

That may include an authenticated version, implementation records, meeting notes, training material or an organisational response.

Employee accounts

Experience is assessed separately from policy

Contributor accounts are not merged into the organisational source. They are coded, assessed and linked only where consent, relevance and source safety allow.

Where the evidence stops

This reconstruction does not authenticate a source or establish workplace practice.

It does not establish that any underlying material was official, current, mandatory, complete, distributed to employees or consistently followed. The original source is not available through this site.