Support
The agenda asks whether enough support was provided and what could have been done differently.
Worked at MECCA? Share what you experienced on your termsStart here
Implementation tool / S5 / Reviewed
Monthly 1:1 Template
A manager and team member agenda covering mood, the month in review, support, Living Values, objectives, growth and next steps.
Scope: Monthly one-to-one conversations; mandatory use not established
Overview
The template creates a recurring structure for documenting a monthly conversation between a team member and manager.
To prompt discussion of progress, challenges, support, values, objectives, development and agreed actions.
- Team members
- Managers conducting monthly one-to-ones
- Discuss wins and challenges
- Ask about support and resources
- Provide feedback
- Review objectives and development
- Confirm next steps
- Prepare notes
- Reflect on the month
- Raise support needs
- Discuss values and development
- Confirm actions
- Living Values
- Compass plan
- Big rocks
- Development plan
Monthly, according to the document title.
- Monthly manager conversation
- Mood and support check
- Review of development plan
- Documented actions and follow-up
Growth
The agenda asks participants to review development focus, roadblocks and required support.
- Did monthly conversations occur?
- Were support needs discussed and addressed?
- Were agreed next steps recorded and followed up?
01Prepare
Team member and manager notes
02Check in
Mood, wins and challenges
03Review
Values, objectives and growth
04Agree
Actions and next steps
Evidence can be added without changing the archive structure.
Future records may include authenticated versions, implementation records, meeting notes, training material or organisational response.
Experience will be assessed separately.
Contributor accounts will not be merged into the organisational source. They will be coded, assessed and linked only where consent, relevance and source safety allow.
Evidence status
Internal guidance identified. Implementation not determined.
This analysis paraphrases what the reviewed source describes. It does not establish that the material was current, mandatory, distributed to every employee or consistently followed in practice.