Accuracy
We take reasonable steps to verify material facts, preserve context and correct significant errors promptly and clearly.
Editorial & ethics policy
These standards apply to research, interviews, editing, publication, corrections and contributor relationships.
We take reasonable steps to verify material facts, preserve context and correct significant errors promptly and clearly.
People and organisations subject to substantive criticism receive a fair summary of the relevant claims and reasonable time to respond.
Published work distinguishes verified facts, first-hand testimony, analysis, opinion and claims that have not been independently verified.
Public interest is weighed against foreseeable harm, privacy, trauma, re-identification risk and the vulnerability of contributors.
Source identities and identifying details are restricted to those who need them for editorial, verification or legal review.
Editorial decisions are not controlled by subjects, contributors, sponsors or commercial interests. Relevant relationships are disclosed.
Material factual errors will be corrected promptly. Significant changes will carry a note describing the correction. Complaints should identify the material, the disputed statement, supporting information and the requested outcome.
Submit a correction or complaintTeam members must disclose personal, financial, employment or advocacy interests that could reasonably affect their work. Conflicts are documented and managed through reassignment, additional review or public disclosure where relevant.
Providing information is not permission to publish. Consent is specific, informed and revisited if the intended use changes. Requests for correction, redaction or withdrawal before publication are assessed promptly and any practical limits are explained.
Access to sensitive material is limited. Information is not shared outside verification, editorial or legal needs without permission, except where required by law or necessary to address an immediate serious safety risk.