Primary WGEA sources
- WGEA Employer Gender Pay Gaps Report (Published March 2026. Reviewed September 2026.)
- Employer Gender Pay Gaps Spreadsheet (XLSX)
- Publishing employer gender pay gaps context
Independent project. Not affiliated with MECCA Brands. Submissions and public comments are not findings.
Benchmark
Gender pay gaps can reveal how remuneration and senior roles are distributed across a workforce. This comparison uses the Workplace Gender Equality Agency’s 2024 to 2025 employer dataset, published on 3 March 2026.
A gender pay gap is not the same as unequal pay for comparable work. The results are not adjusted for occupation, seniority, hours, location or individual role. They should be read alongside workforce composition, remuneration quartiles and each employer’s published context.
Official employer data. Reporting period: 2024 to 2025. Last reviewed: 4 September 2026.
Note: Positive result means average remuneration gap is in favour of men. Negative result means average remuneration gap is in favour of women. WGEA target range is -5% to +5%, shaded in grey.
A large negative gap indicates higher average remuneration for women, but does not automatically achieve pay equality across all roles.
Analysis based on official WGEA data
MECCA’s average total remuneration gap is 26.6%, while its median gap is 4.9%. The 21.7 percentage-point difference indicates that the mean is being influenced more strongly by remuneration away from the middle of the workforce distribution.
MECCA also reports that women comprise 90% of its Upper Quartile and 95% of its workforce overall. These published figures do not identify individual employees, their roles or their remuneration. WGEA data alone cannot establish whether a small group of executives caused the gap or explain the decisions behind it.
Methodology
Reviewed September 2026.
Reviewed September 2026.
Reviewed September 2026.